<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in Compare notebook history | Unfuddle Community</title>
    <link>http://unfuddle.com/community</link>
    <description>Unfuddle Community Forums</description>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:3:86:237</guid>
      <title>Compare notebook history posted by alovhaug @ Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:16:53 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/3/topics/86</link>
      <description>My first attempt at comparing a notebook history wasn't that impressive. I do understand this is a difficult activity, but I'm hoping it can be better.

Here's what it did with one sentence:
Original sentence:
Possible: Remove all property fields so that we use tblPropertyMaster, tblPropertyAddress, tblPropertyName, tblPropertyCity, and tblPropertyCounty instead. 

Replacement sentence:
Possible: Remove all property fields so that we use various contact tables instead. 

How it handled the history comparison:
http://www.coolbits.nu/historyexample.jpg

Also, note the inserted section a few lines above. It handled the second inserted double quote correctly, but the first one shows HTML instead.

Neither one of these are mission critical...just thought I'd mention it in case something can be done to improve things. Thanks!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:16:53 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>alovhaug</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:3:86:240</guid>
      <title>Compare notebook history replied by David C. @ Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:08:52 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/3/topics/86</link>
      <description>alovhaug,

Thanks for your feedback.

We are interested in making Notebooks as friendly as possible and, especially because they are brand new we are eager to hear what can be improved. That being the case, we can certainly look into updating the output of the compare feature.

Please do not hesitate to let us know if you have any other comments or questions.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:08:52 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>David C.</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

