<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in Feature Requests | Unfuddle Community</title>
    <link>http://unfuddle.com/community</link>
    <description>Unfuddle Community Forums</description>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:72ba62:3dfc63</guid>
      <title>Code Commenting replied by Christiaan @ Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:55:37 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/72ba62</link>
      <description>I don't think you should use repository to document your code. Commit comments describe what functionality has changed with the new version, not how each line of group of lines work.

You could commit in multiple fases with 1 commit per functionality.

You can keep code documentation in your code. But also have a shrinked version. When it comes to javascript, you can use the yui compressor.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:55:37 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>Christiaan</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:152:497</guid>
      <title>Email Notifications &amp; Gmail Conversations posted by Mauronic @ Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:38:43 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/152</link>
      <description>Due to the generic subject lines of unfuddle email notifications, gmail puts all my unfuddle notifications into a huge conversation thread.  I would prefer these conversations to be grouped by bug or message.

If the subject line was changed such that Gmail would do a better job organizing conversation threads (e.g. into conversations about bugs, messages, etc) these notifications would be a lot easier to manage and act on.

I am not sure of a sure fire way to do this because their conversation grouping algorithm is not entirely transparent.  However, I bet starting with more specific subject lines would help.  (Right now, it seems that every subject line reads &quot;Recent Activity for &lt;project name&gt;&quot;.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:38:43 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>Mauronic</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:761:2133</guid>
      <title>Don't save most recent Status as default replied by Joshua Frappier @ Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:48:29 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/761</link>
      <description>Most of the time, if one enters a sequence of tickets, they tend to be similar in form. Accordingly, as you have noticed, we try to be smart about remembering previous values.

There is currently no way to specify default values that will always display first. We will consider your post as a +1 for this feature.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:48:29 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>Joshua Frappier</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:102:301</guid>
      <title>Importing from Trac posted by Keith Lancaster @ Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:27:58 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/102</link>
      <description>I have a been using unfuddle for some small projects (I have a micro level account) and have found it quite useful. I am considering moving our main project over to Unfuddle, but we have a pretty significant Trac database of issues, defects, etc. that we can't lose. Has anyone come up with a way to convert/import trac tickets?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:27:58 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>Keith Lancaster</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:115:2162</guid>
      <title>[killer] IM/Chat Integration replied by webmasterkai @ Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:40:42 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/115</link>
      <description>We use gtalk and custom jabber servers.  Jabber integration is the most requested feature in our office.  It's something we had when using our custom project management software.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:40:42 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>webmasterkai</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:120:2363</guid>
      <title>CNAME Pointer to Other Domain? replied by tobiassjosten @ Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:08:49 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/120</link>
      <description>Thanks for reassuring us that you are at least still &quot;out there&quot;. Looking forward to seeing this feature, whenever it shows up!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:08:49 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>tobiassjosten</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:121:614</guid>
      <title>Allow customers to report bugs (submit ticket)? replied by DW @ Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:14:04 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/121</link>
      <description>Thanks Ben. I'll check it.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:14:04 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>DW</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:123:1018</guid>
      <title>Rich Text Editor replied by DW @ Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:54:23 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/123</link>
      <description>&quot;I would like to have our folks in non-tech areas (business analysts, etc) start actively sharing information through unfuddle wiki pages. Markup wouldn&#8217;t be comfortable for them.&quot;

I face the same problem before. In the end, they (business user in my company) don't use Unfuddle. 
:-( I don't know why many people in this forum think from programmer's perspective. They don't know how &quot;difficult&quot; for those business people to read how to use plain text markup.

I love Unfuddle. Our developer use this. But we must use separate software for business users. I'm thinking to move to FogBugz before. I still use Unfuddle because I hope they'll add this feature later.

Btw, don't get me wrong. I *really* love Unfuddle. But you have to be realistic. Are you selling this software only for developers? There are many potential users who prefer to use rich text editor. :-)

&quot;FogBugz Rich Text Editor&quot;:http://www.fogcreek.com/FogBugz/learnmore.html#hist_RichTextEditor</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:54:23 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>DW</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:123:2029</guid>
      <title>Rich Text Editor replied by ShayneM @ Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:32:05 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/123</link>
      <description>+1 for this

Markdown is ok for devs (most of the time) but some flexibility would not hurt.
Be ware of not doing the 37Sigs thing and not listening to what users want and offering options rather then deciding for them</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:32:05 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>ShayneM</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:127:381</guid>
      <title>Continuous build integration posted by Nix_o_lay @ Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:10:58 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/127</link>
      <description>Guys,

Do you plan to add continuous build integrations support? This may add valuability to some of your plans.

WBR,
Nikolay Ryabkov.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:10:58 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>Nix_o_lay</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:148:928</guid>
      <title>Manually Associate Changesets replied by Michael Bleigh @ Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:22:52 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/148</link>
      <description>Thanks as always!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:22:52 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>Michael Bleigh</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:276:951</guid>
      <title>Honor carrier returns in commit messages replied by Luis Lavena @ Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:06:10 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/276</link>
      <description>Thanks David,

Is great to see my comments now well formatted ;-)

Also thanks to work so quickly!

Have a nice weekend!
--
Luis Lavena</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:06:10 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>Luis Lavena</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:304:aadc34</guid>
      <title>Agile/Scrumm and unfuddle replied by Gleb @ Sun, 07 Nov 2010 23:08:03 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/304</link>
      <description>agree especially with displaying tickets as a tree- these relations aren't very convenient to use the way they are implemented now</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 23:08:03 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>Gleb</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:350:1137</guid>
      <title>Setting Default Permissions posted by ghostradio @ Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:07:19 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/350</link>
      <description>Many members of our team have the same permissions level on several projects. Would it be possible to set a default permissions level for a person that is carried over to whatever project they get assigned to? In some cases we may want to tweak their permissions on a specific project, but those permissions would be unique to that particular project.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:07:19 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>ghostradio</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:38:102</guid>
      <title>PHP Markdown Extra posted by Christian Vitroler @ Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:15:16 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/38</link>
      <description>Would it be too much to ask for an implementation of those enhancements? After all, there is already an implementation in Ruby, namely [Maruku](http://maruku.rubyforge.org/maruku.html)

Oops... Markdown for links does not work here... anyway... http://maruku.rubyforge.org/maruku.htm</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:15:16 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>Christian Vitroler</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:408:2027</guid>
      <title>Notification emails in real-time replied by ShayneM @ Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:23:35 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/408</link>
      <description>+1 for this</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:23:35 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>ShayneM</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:420:2115</guid>
      <title>Restrict information sent in email notifications replied by David C. @ Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:29:44 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/420</link>
      <description>Youngblood,

This is not currently implemented within Unfuddle. This has not been a very oft requested feature, however, we can certainly discuss internally the idea of &quot;locking down&quot; an account like this.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:29:44 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>David C.</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:431:1506</guid>
      <title>change markdown replied by Ben Strackany @ Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:39:42 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/431</link>
      <description>Well, I will say that the FM could do a better job on explaining or showing how to create nested lists.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:39:42 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>Ben Strackany</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:431:2028</guid>
      <title>change markdown replied by ShayneM @ Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:24:41 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/431</link>
      <description>We also find markdown a pain at times due to the need to preview and re-edit
Why not offer a fully WYSIWIG options using FCKEditor or TinyMCE?
Could toggle between both on toolbar thus catering for all needs.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:24:41 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>ShayneM</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:448:1415</guid>
      <title>Assign ticket to someone for verification posted by jumpfroggy @ Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:10:11 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/448</link>
      <description>Often I create a ticket, resolve it, then want to assign it to someone for verification.  Unfortunately verification is hard-linked to the reporter, which is non-editable.  So in order to assign it, it also becomes unresolved.

It would be nice to be able to assign the ticket to someone for verification, without having to unresolve it.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:10:11 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>jumpfroggy</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:456:1696</guid>
      <title>Preview for all markdown input fields replied by Thomas Jones-Low @ Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:58:40 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/456</link>
      <description>I would like to second this. Coming from wikimedia where preview is ubiquitous and encouraged, I fnd the lack of a preview function very frustrating.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:58:40 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>Thomas Jones-Low</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:47:530</guid>
      <title>Email a ticket replied by max @ Fri, 08 Feb 2008 06:02:47 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/47</link>
      <description>David,

Sorry that it took so long for me to reply, but yes...you nailed it on the head.  It would be great to have some type of &quot;send reminder&quot; option and that would be helpful for any section.  Great to hear that you agree with this!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 06:02:47 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>max</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:600:1641</guid>
      <title>Universal Ticket Numbers posted by chrisk @ Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:27:46 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/600</link>
      <description>We use the concept of unfuddle Projects extensively and each project has its own queue of tickets. Oftentimes a ticket will move from one project (say &quot;Feature Requests&quot;) to another (say &quot;Engineering&quot;). It'd be nice to be able to see the history of the tickets as they move throughout the unfuddle system. Today when a ticket moves across projects it picks up the next ticket number in that particular project's queue, and there is no way to reference the ticket in the &quot;old&quot; project after it's been saved to the new project.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:27:46 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>chrisk</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:600:1702</guid>
      <title>Universal Ticket Numbers replied by Stewart Robinson @ Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:33:10 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/600</link>
      <description>+1 to this.  This is needed. I can't tell with my commits which project a ticket belongs to as all my projects share the same source control</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:33:10 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>Stewart Robinson</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.unfuddle.com/community:1:61:169</guid>
      <title>Latest comments RSS replied by David C. @ Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:57:55 UTC</title>
      <link>http://www.unfuddle.com/community/forums/1/topics/61</link>
      <description>Ben,

As Josh just mentioned in &quot;another post&quot;:http://unfuddle.com/community/forums/4/topics/58 we have considered adding comments to the recent activity list on the overview and dashboard, but in its current layout the list could get very long and unwieldy. So, currently, the best way to keep track of comments on a ticket or message is via the email notifications.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:57:55 UTC</pubDate>
      <author>David C.</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

